The Vivo X300 Ultra, priced around $635 based on its original €600 market pricing, has landed in third place in DxOMark’s latest smartphone camera rankings, just behind its more affordable sibling, the Vivo X300 Pro. This outcome is unexpected given the Ultra model’s premium positioning and higher price point compared to the Pro.
- The Vivo X300 Ultra ranks third in DxOMark camera scores, just behind the Vivo X300 Pro.
- Despite its price premium, the Ultra model falls short mainly due to video performance issues.
- The Pro model outperforms the Ultra in low-light scenarios and video stability.
- Both phones excel in ultra-wide, telephoto, bokeh, and zoom photography.
Video performance issues impact the Vivo X300 Ultra’s ranking
Although the Vivo X300 Ultra generally matches or exceeds the Pro model across most camera categories, its video score is notably lower by 10 points. This single factor significantly influenced the overall rankings. The Ultra’s video glitches and the presence of AI artifacts during recording, especially in challenging lighting, contributed to this deduction.
The Ultra was specifically marketed for strong video capabilities, so this outcome may come as a disappointment. The inconsistent video performance, particularly under low light, raises questions about its suitability for users prioritizing video quality.
Low-light photography remains a strength for the Vivo X300 Pro
In low-light conditions, the Vivo X300 Pro still holds a competitive edge, delivering cleaner images with less noise compared to the Ultra. The Ultra showed increased noise and artifacts in darker environments, along with some unnatural AI-generated textures, which can detract from image authenticity.
Strong performance in ultra-wide, telephoto, and zoom photography
Both Vivo models perform well in ultra-wide-angle shots, telephoto zoom, and bokeh effects. These areas remain highlights for Vivo’s camera technology, maintaining their position among top camera phones on the market. The Oppo Find X9 Ultra closely follows behind these two Vivo devices in the rankings.
For buyers focused on camera performance, particularly video and low-light photography, the Vivo X300 Pro offers compelling value despite its lower price. The Ultra, while premium priced, may underdeliver in real-world video scenarios due to processing artifacts and inconsistencies.
Via: Notebookcheck
